Scotland\u2019s status in the union is on the agenda once again. Another dominant victory for the ruling Scottish National Party in May\u2019s Scottish Parliament elections was quickly followed by First Minister Nicola Sturgeon announcing on 7 September that she aimed to seek a referendum by 2023, saying the question of Scotland\u2019s future \u2018cannot be avoided, nor postponed until the die is already cast\u2019. But does it matter how the question of Scotland\u2019s future is asked? Could the verdict the Scots deliver in a second independence referendum hinge on the precise wording of the ballot question \u2013 and, in turn, on how the voters think about the choice before them?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The wording of the ballot question was a matter of dispute ahead of the referendum in 2014, with the SNP government initially arguing that Scots should be asked \u2018Do you agree that Scotland should be an independent country?\u2019 (Yes\/No)<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Electoral Commission criticised this as a potentially leading question, and in the end the Scottish government put forward the alternative \u2018yes\/no\u2019 question \u2013 \u2018Should Scotland be an independent country?\u2019 (Yes\/No) \u2013 that was eventually used.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The subsequent 2016 EU referendum provided Scottish voters, like those elsewhere in the UK, with an alternative way to frame a constitutional question. Voters were not given a yes\/no question but instead asked whether they wanted to \u2018Leave\u2019 or \u2018Remain\u2019 in the EU. The same formulation can be used to ask: \u2018Should Scotland remain in the United Kingdom or leave the United Kingdom?\u2019 (Remain\/Leave)<\/p>\n\n\n\n
All three versions of the referendum question are at least theoretical possibilities for any future Scottish independence referendum. While the likeliest outcome is a rerun of the 2014 question, the pro-independence side may press again for the \u2018do you agree\u2019 formulation. Meanwhile the Leave\/Remain wording has support from the unionist camp: not only as a supposedly more neutral question but also as it might enable them to profit from the widespread (EU) Remain sympathies in Scotland.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
These disagreements suggest that each side believes the choice of question is consequential. Are they right?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Survey researchers have long known that the wording of a question can influence how it is answered. Questions which begin \u2018do you agree\u2019 encourage acquiescence bias, <\/em>increasing agreement, particularly among people without strong starting views on the matter at hand. A similar dynamic can apply to yes\/no questions, with at least some people drawn towards the apparently more positive, assertive \u2018yes\u2019 option.<\/p>\n\n\n\n To continue reading,\u00a0please click here.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Article originally appeared on the LSE Politics and Policy Blog.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n The <\/em>featured image<\/em><\/a> in this article is used under a <\/em>Creative Commons licence<\/em><\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Could the outcome of a second Scottish independence referendum depend on the precise wording of the ballot question? John Garry, Rob Ford, Rob Johns discuss three likely wordings and their potential implications.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2431,"featured_media":4343,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":true,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8019","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-politics-and-democracy"],"mb":[],"acf":{"authors":{"simple_value_formatted":"