The Framework is intended to provide clearer and more consistent information about using AI in learning, teaching and assessment. You should continue to follow the specific guidance from your School, programme and module, and always refer to the instructions in each assessment brief.

Each assessment will be assigned a category explaining whether, and to what extent, AI tools may be used. See section 4.4 of the AI in Education Policy for more information.

Different disciplines assess different forms of knowledge, skills and professional practice. An appropriate use of AI in one context may be inappropriate in another. The University’s approach aims to provide greater clarity and consistency while acknowledging differences across disciplines.

Where AI is used to support assessment, feedback, progression decisions or academic integrity processes, we will ensure that academic judgement remains central. AI generated outputs or recommendations will not be considered in isolation. Staff using AI in these contexts will be expected to apply disciplinary and professional judgement.

The appropriate use of AI in research will depend on the type of research activity, discipline and relevant ethical and academic requirements. AI can support aspects of research, but it also raises important questions around accuracy, transparency, bias, copyright and research integrity. Further guidance will be shared as work in this area progresses.

AI tools have limitations and may produce inaccurate or incomplete content. You should verify information and arguments using appropriate academic sources and research methods. You remain responsible for the accuracy, integrity and quality of the work you produce with AI support.

Queen's recognises that AI raises concerns around bias, transparency, privacy, copyright and sustainability. These concerns will continue to inform and shape our approach to the use of AI in education and research.

We will raise awareness of AI's environmental footprint, promote sustainable digital practices and help students develop the knowledge and skills to use AI responsibly in their studies and future careers.

No. Critical thinking, creativity, subject expertise, ethical reasoning, judgement and human understanding remain fundamental to a Queen’s education. Our aim is to help students develop the ability to work confidently with emerging technologies while also being able to critique them, understand their limitations and use them responsibly.

Student consultation and co-creation will continue to help shape implementation and identify where greater clarity is needed. We will continue to work with SU officers and invite student representatives to participate, ensuring appropriate representation across disciplines.